atomic(9)

NAME

atomic_add, atomic_clear, atomic_cmpset, atomic_fetchadd,
atomic_load,
atomic_readandclear, atomic_set, atomic_subtract,
atomic_store - atomic
operations

SYNOPSIS

#include <sys/types.h>
#include <machine/atomic.h>
void
atomic_add_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);
void
atomic_clear_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile  <type>  *p,  <type>
v);
int
atomic_cmpset_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *dst, <type>
old,
        <type> new);
<type>
atomic_fetchadd_<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);
<type>
atomic_load_acq_<type>(volatile <type> *p);
<type>
atomic_readandclear_<type>(volatile <type> *p);
void
atomic_set_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);
void
atomic_subtract_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type>
v);
void
atomic_store_rel_<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);

DESCRIPTION

Each of the atomic operations is guaranteed to be atomic in
the presence
of interrupts. They can be used to implement reference
counts or as
building blocks for more advanced synchronization primitives
such as
mutexes.
Types
Each atomic operation operates on a specific type. The type
to use is
indicated in the function name. The available types that
can be used
are:

int unsigned integer
long unsigned long integer
ptr unsigned integer the size of a pointer
32 unsigned 32-bit integer
64 unsigned 64-bit integer
For example, the function to atomically add two integers is
called
atomic_add_int().
Certain architectures also provide operations for types
smaller than
``int''.

char unsigned character
short unsigned short integer
8 unsigned 8-bit integer
16 unsigned 16-bit integer
These must not be used in MI code because the instructions
to implement
them efficiently may not be available.
Memory Barriers
Memory barriers are used to guarantee the order of data ac
cesses in two
ways. First, they specify hints to the compiler to not re
order or optimize the operations. Second, on architectures that do not
guarantee
ordered data accesses, special instructions or special vari
ants of
instructions are used to indicate to the processor that data
accesses
need to occur in a certain order. As a result, most of the
atomic operations have three variants in order to include optional memo
ry barriers.
The first form just performs the operation without any ex
plicit barriers.
The second form uses a read memory barrier, and the third
variant uses a
write memory barrier.
The second variant of each operation includes a read memory
barrier.
This barrier ensures that the effects of this operation are
completed
before the effects of any later data accesses. As a result,
the operation is said to have acquire semantics as it acquires a
pseudo-lock
requiring further operations to wait until it has completed.
To denote
this, the suffix ``_acq'' is inserted into the function name
immediately
prior to the ``_<type>'' suffix. For example, to subtract
two integers
ensuring that any later writes will happen after the sub
traction is performed, use atomic_subtract_acq_int().
The third variant of each operation includes a write memory
barrier.
This ensures that all effects of all previous data accesses
are completed
before this operation takes place. As a result, the opera
tion is said to
have release semantics as it releases any pending data ac
cesses to be
completed before its operation is performed. To denote
this, the suffix
``_rel'' is inserted into the function name immediately pri
or to the
``_<type>'' suffix. For example, to add two long integers
ensuring that
all previous writes will happen first, use
atomic_add_rel_long().
A practical example of using memory barriers is to ensure
that data
accesses that are protected by a lock are all performed
while the lock is
held. To achieve this, one would use a read barrier when
acquiring the
lock to guarantee that the lock is held before any protected
operations
are performed. Finally, one would use a write barrier when
releasing the
lock to ensure that all of the protected operations are com
pleted before
the lock is released.
Multiple Processors
The current set of atomic operations do not necessarily
guarantee atomicity across multiple processors. To guarantee atomicity
across processors, not only does the individual operation need to be
atomic on the
processor performing the operation, but the result of the
operation needs
to be pushed out to stable storage and the caches of all
other processors
on the system need to invalidate any cache lines that in
clude the
affected memory region. On the i386 architecture, the cache
coherency
model requires that the hardware perform this task, thus the
atomic operations are atomic across multiple processors. On the ia64
architecture,
coherency is only guaranteed for pages that are configured
to using a
caching policy of either uncached or write back.
Semantics
This section describes the semantics of each operation using
a C like
notation.
atomic_add(p, v)
*p += v;
atomic_clear(p, v)
*p &= ~v;
atomic_cmpset(dst, old, new)
if (*dst == old) {
*dst = new;
return 1;
} else
return 0;
The atomic_cmpset() functions are not implemented for the
types ``char'',
``short'', ``8'', and ``16''.
atomic_fetchadd(p, v)
tmp = *p;
*p += v;
return tmp;
The atomic_fetchadd() functions are only implemented for the
types
``int'' and ``32'' and do not have any variants with memory
barriers at
this time.
atomic_load(addr)
return (*addr)
The atomic_load() functions always have acquire semantics.
atomic_readandclear(addr)
temp = *addr;
*addr = 0;
return (temp);
The atomic_readandclear() functions are not implemented for
the types
``char'', ``short'', ``ptr'', ``8'', and ``16'' and do not
have any variants with memory barriers at this time.
atomic_set(p, v)
*p |= v;
atomic_subtract(p, v)
*p -= v;
atomic_store(p, v)
*p = v;
The atomic_store() functions always have release semantics.
The type ``64'' is currently not implemented for any of the
atomic operations on the arm, i386, and powerpc architectures.

RETURN VALUES

The atomic_cmpset() function returns the result of the com
pare operation.
The atomic_fetchadd(), atomic_load(), and
atomic_readandclear() functions
return the value at the specified address.

EXAMPLES

This example uses the atomic_cmpset_acq_ptr() and
atomic_set_ptr() functions to obtain a sleep mutex and handle recursion. Since
the mtx_lock
member of a struct mtx is a pointer, the ``ptr'' type is
used.
/* Try to obtain mtx_lock once. */
#define _obtain_lock(mp, tid)
atomic_cmpset_acq_ptr(&(mp)->mtx_lock, MTX_UNOWNED, (tid))
/* Get a sleep lock, deal with recursion inline. */
#define _get_sleep_lock(mp, tid, opts, file, line) do {
uintptr_t _tid = (uintptr_t)(tid);
if (!_obtain_lock(mp, tid)) {
if (((mp)->mtx_lock & MTX_FLAGMASK) != _tid)
_mtx_lock_sleep((mp), _tid, (opts), (file), (line));
else {
atomic_set_ptr(&(mp)->mtx_lock, MTX_RECURSE);
(mp)->mtx_recurse++; } } } while (0)

HISTORY

The atomic_add(), atomic_clear(), atomic_set(), and
atomic_subtract()
operations were first introduced in FreeBSD 3.0. This first
set only
supported the types ``char'', ``short'', ``int'', and
``long''. The
atomic_cmpset(), atomic_load(), atomic_readandclear(), and
atomic_store()
operations were added in FreeBSD 5.0. The types ``8'',
``16'', ``32'',
``64'', and ``ptr'' and all of the acquire and release vari
ants were
added in FreeBSD 5.0 as well. The atomic_fetchadd() opera
tions were
added in FreeBSD 6.0.
BSD October 27, 2000
Copyright © 2010-2025 Platon Technologies, s.r.o.           Home | Man pages | tLDP | Documents | Utilities | About
Design by styleshout